Flexible packaging has become widely used across pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and healthcare products due to its lightweight design, storage efficiency, and material versatility. Pouches, sachets, and multi-layer films support a wide range of product formats while helping manufacturers optimize space and logistics. At the same time, these materials behave differently from rigid containers during filling, sealing, storage, and distribution. This creates new inspection demands when confirming Container Closure Integrity (CCI). Reliable CCI verification for flexible materials depends on using test systems that match the physical behaviour of films and seals while delivering consistent and traceable results across production environments.
Understanding CCI Challenges with Flexible Packaging
Flexible packaging is designed to bend, compress, and expand, which creates added complexity during integrity testing. Unlike rigid containers, these materials respond dynamically to pressure and vacuum conditions. During testing, package deformation can hide small defects, making leak detection more difficult.
Seal construction adds another layer of challenge. Flexible pouches often use multi-layer films joined through heat sealing. Variations in sealing temperature, pressure, and dwell time can result in channel defects, weak seals, or micro voids that remain invisible during visual inspection. These hidden flaws may allow air or moisture to enter without obvious signs of failure.
Headspace variation further affects testing behaviour. Some packages contain minimal internal gas, while others rely on modified atmospheres. These differences influence how packages respond during testing and can lead to inconsistent measurements when non-adaptive systems are used.
Traditional inspection methods depend heavily on visual checks and destructive testing. Visual inspection is influenced by lighting, contrast, and operator experience, while destructive methods increase product waste and limit routine sampling.
Transport and handling also impact seal performance. Vibration, stacking pressure, and temperature changes during distribution can cause seal deformation after production. Together, these factors make flexible packaging one of the more challenging formats for maintaining reliable package integrity.
Choosing the Right Test Methods for Flexible Materials
Selecting a test method suited to flexible materials begins with choosing deterministic technologies that deliver data-driven outcomes rather than visual interpretation. Two widely adopted approaches include vacuum decay testing with VeriPac FLEX and Airborne Ultrasound testing.
1. VeriPac FLEX
VeriPac FLEX systems offer non-destructive inspection for pouches and flexible packaging, delivering clear PASS/FAIL results with quantitative leak-rate data. These systems support a wide range of package sizes and formats without requiring tooling changes, from small sachets and stick packs to large bulk pouches and bags. Based on ASTM F2338-24 vacuum decay leak testing and recognized by ISO 11607 and the FDA, VeriPac FLEX serves as an effective alternative to destructive methods by reducing subjectivity, waste, and testing costs. The technology also delivers fast return on investment while providing reliable detection of packaging defects and valuable process insights.
2. Airborne Ultrasound
Airborne Ultrasound is a non-destructive method used for seal quality testing and detect defects in packaging. It is defined under ASTM F3004 and recognized by the FDA as a standard for seal quality evaluation. This approach is widely applied for enhanced inspection of pouches and flexible packages. During testing, ultrasound waves pass through the package seal and reflect. The change in signal strength indicate the presence of leaks or defects, which are carefully analyzed for accurate detection. Airborne Ultrasound supports detailed seal assessment and is suitable for a wide range of materials, including Tyvek, paper, foil, film, aluminium, plastic, and poly.
Flexible packaging brings efficiency and adaptability, but it also introduces inspection demands that differ from rigid formats. Material movement, seal variation, and transport stress all influence how well a package performs beyond the production line. Visual and destructive checks alone often leave gaps in inspection coverage and repeatability. When manufacturers adopt objective, measurement-based verification aligned with packaging design and process conditions, they gain stronger visibility into seal performance. This approach supports consistent inspection practices from development through distribution. With dependable verification in place, manufacturers strengthen oversight, reduce uncertainty, and maintain steady package performance throughout the product lifecycle.